#SIMCITY 2000 FOR MAC OS 9 WINDOWS#

I was under the impression that it was released alone earlier. The article also seems to suggest that the Win95 version was introduced with Special Edition. In the bottom-right corner of the first disk's label, it says '(C) 1993, 1994 Sim-Business / All Rights Reserved / 002-A'.) (Note: This is the one that came on floppies. It does not require any special settings to run, though many of the animations only work in 256 color mode.

#SIMCITY 2000 FOR MAC OS 9 WINDOWS#

I have successfully run the original 16-bit Windows version on Windows 95, 98 and XP. The statement in the section about Special Edition that the original does not run on Windows 95 is false. Reply by original editor(Chris Batchelor): I recently moved this information to it's own separate page, since no action had been taken and I felt that it needed it's own page, since it is it's own game-page.Chris Batchelor 00:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC) -Preceding unsigned comment added by Byankno1 ( talk.

Therefore, I think, to be consistent with all the other Sim Games, this sub-sim Game should have it's own page, created with the text right from the article(section 2: Sim City Urban Renewal Kit).Ĭhris Batchelor 13:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Chris Batchelor, June 24,2007 It was it's own separate package back in the mid 90's. BetacommandBot 11:26, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Reply move Urban Renewal Kit to separate page devoted to Sim City Urban Renewal Kit If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.

Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. Image:Simcity2000 Arcology.jpg is being used on this article. Also, is there any important use of this individual SCURK building, doesn't Image:Wltvll3.gif fill in this role, depicting the same building many times? ╫ ２５ ◀RingADing▶ 20:36, 2 December 2006 (UTC) ╫ Reply Joke When viewed using Firefox, it does appear excessive in first half of the article section three screenshots in the relatively short introduction and Overview sections, already problematic with the limited space created with the infobox. The paragraph merge in the Overview section didn't help either it left little room for adjusting image arrangements. Appears Red Pooka tried to squeeze the custom city screenshot alongside the table on contents, but it ends up looking not just saturated with images in Firefox, but also messed up in thumbnail arrangement. $PЯINGrαgђ Always loyal! 20:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC) Reply Looks like the problem seems to be localized to at least to Firefox (compare output in IE with Firefox, as of November 25). If any more are added, though, I must say it would be a bit excessiev. ╫ ２５ ◀RingADing▶ 20:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC) ╫ Reply Um, I don't really think so, at least not yet. Does anyone have the feeling there are way too many screenshots here? It's not just affecting the readability of the article, but also breaching WP:FUC by including too many fair use images, some for seemingly minor features.

Simcity 2000 for mac os 9